BLAG

BLAG Forums
It is currently Sun Dec 21, 2014 2:37 am

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: 59k and aterm
PostPosted: Thu Nov 23, 2006 3:42 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2006 8:38 pm
Posts: 373
Location: Athol, Massachusetts, USA
59k seems to be running flawlessly for me. The only glitchy problem I have is that aterm has a strange green background. It's there even when transparency is enabled. It gives a green distorted cast to the transparency, and it's just bright green when transparency isn't enabled. I got the aterm package from the blag repository. xterm and gnome-terminal aren't affected, the xfce Terminal isn't affect either, and it also uses transparency. Any ideas?

_________________
Ed LaBonte


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 24, 2006 12:59 am 
Offline
Site Admin

Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2004 6:17 pm
Posts: 1340
Location: London, UK
hrm that's odd. I run `aterm -tr +sb -fg red -tint green` to get a tint other wise it's no tint for me. Are your monitor settings OK? Do you have any thing unusual in ~/.X-foo?
http://www.jayeola.org/images/ss/ss-two_blag_vm.png That's a screen shot of mrxvt and aterm running.

_________________
BLAG 'em up!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 24, 2006 11:21 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2006 8:38 pm
Posts: 373
Location: Athol, Massachusetts, USA
Here's a screenshot of what I get.
http://gnu-linux.us/Screenshot.png

The window on the upper left I ran with: aterm
The window on the lower right I ran with: aterm -tr -sh 50 -fg white

I've got no hidden .X-foo files because I installed this on a clean partition. The only things on it are what came with the installation. Again I'm running 59k not 50k.

I get the following error message when running aterm:

Quote:
aterm has encountered the following problem interacting with X Windows :
Request: 70, Error: 8(BadMatch (invalid parameter attributes))
in resource: 0x2E0002B

_________________
Ed LaBonte


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Nov 25, 2006 12:54 am 
Offline
Site Admin

Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2004 6:17 pm
Posts: 1340
Location: London, UK
From this changelog it looks as if it shou;dve been fixeed. http://rpmfind.net/linux/RPM/falsehope/ ... .i386.html
Want to try to update/dist-upgrade your system, remove and install again?

_________________
BLAG 'em up!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Dec 02, 2006 12:57 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2006 8:38 pm
Posts: 373
Location: Athol, Massachusetts, USA
john maclean wrote:
From this changelog it looks as if it shou;dve been fixeed. http://rpmfind.net/linux/RPM/falsehope/ ... .i386.html
Want to try to update/dist-upgrade your system, remove and install again?


I tried all that with no improvement. I then uninstall the fedora aterm package and got the source code and compiled from source. That works great. So it was something about the fedora package, at least as it interacts with blag 59k and my machine...

But anyway, I've got aterm :)

_________________
Ed LaBonte


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group