BLAG Forums
It is currently Fri Nov 27, 2015 3:27 pm

All times are UTC

Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 33 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

Do you believe the offical 911 story?
Poll ended at Mon Apr 30, 2007 9:03 pm
Yes 38%  38%  [ 5 ]
No 62%  62%  [ 8 ]
Total votes : 13
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 16, 2007 4:03 am 

Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2006 8:38 pm
Posts: 373
Location: Athol, Massachusetts, USA
Not to beat a dead horse, but here's Noam Chomsky's take on it. I'm not using Chomsky as an authority, but he displays the critical thinking that it takes to be a scholar or a scientist:

Noam Chomsky: 9-11: Institutional Analysis vs. Conspiracy Theory
Submitted by Noam Chomsky on Fri, 2006-10-06 14:09.
Categories: Middle East | United States | US Foreign Policy

The following is an exchange between a ZNet Sustainer and Noam Chomsky, which took place in the Sustainer Web Board where Noam hosts a forum...

ZNet Sustainer: Dear Noam, There is much documentation observed and uncovered by the 911 families themselves suggesting a criminal conspiracy within the Bush Administration to cover-up the 9/11 attacks (see DVD, 9/11: Press for Truth). Additionally, much evidence has been put forward to question the official version of events. This has come in part from Paul Thompson, an activist who has creatively established the 9/11 Timeline, a free 9/11 investigative database for activist researchers, which now, according to The Village Voice’s James Ridgeway, rivals the 9/11 Commission’s report in accuracy and lucidity (see,,mondo1,52830,6.html, or

Noam Chomsky: Hard for me to respond to the rest of the letter, because I am not persuaded by the assumption that much documentation and other evidence has been uncovered. To determine that, we'd have to investigate the alleged evidence. Take, say, the physical evidence. There are ways to assess that: submit it to specialists -- of whom there are thousands -- who have the requisite background in civil-mechanical engineering, materials science, building construction, etc., for review and analysis; and one cannot gain the required knowledge by surfing the internet. In fact, that's been done, by the professional association of civil engineers. Or, take the course pursued by anyone who thinks they have made a genuine discovery: submit it to a serious journal for peer review and publication. To my knowledge, there isn't a single submission.

Ed LaBonte

 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 15, 2007 8:22 pm 

Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 1:23 am
Posts: 15
I think it is pretty clear to anyone that is not (0)glassy-eyed(0) the evidence suggest their is more to the story than what you and myself were instructed to believe.

Any arguing will not help. The best way is to present the evidence that has not been shipped to xyz coountry...

 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 03, 2011 8:04 pm 

Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 7:53 pm
Posts: 1
They killed Osama and buried him before they told us. Sounds as fishy as the event they say he was responsible for.

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 33 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

All times are UTC

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group